
- A union which has failed miserably to see outside its own self-serving interests.
- A union which has failed to improve the lives of its members.
- A union which has failed to create a winning strategy for contract bargaining
- A union which has failed to focus on its members, rather only the dues $$$$$
- A union which has failed to be honest or have integrity
- A union which has failed to halt the fear mongering and scare tactics
- A union which has failed to listen to the membership
- A union which has failed to rid itself of internal petty politics
- A union which has failed to support democratic ideals with unwelcome appointments
- A union which has failed to deliver, again and again.......
So the AFA membership is now stuck (into 2010) with an International President that is no longer a flight attendant!! Queen Bee Friend will continue siphoning off hundreds of thousands of $$$ dollars more from AFA during her tenure and not even be on a flight attendant seniority list; all the while collecting her airline retirement.
We can only imagine the princely sum AFA-CWA will begin paying out in retirement benefits to the Queen when her term ends in 2010. Curious to know exactly what President Friend will collect from your dues for her AFA tenure?? (Alongside her United pension too.) Ask your lecmec@nwaafa.org
Ask yourself.....And what exactly has Pat Friend done for you??
Like we said, Patricia Friend has done well for "herself". Ask the Aloha or ATA flight attendants how well Queen Friend & Company has done for them??? Ask those flight attendants working under pay concessions (the majority of AFA members) and those airlines facing further bankruptcies (hello, United)....How well has Pat Friend and her team done for them???
What is the term "a vacancy in office"?? (AFA Constitution Article IV, Sec G.1) One can ask, if an officer is no longer a flight attendant, how can one "fairly" represent the largest "flight attendant" union in the world? Would not it make ethical sense to relinquish the the top position when one decides to no longer participate in the profession??
What kind of public image does such failure to relinquish power display to the membership? What of the "transparency" within our union? The political and power hungry International Queen wants the best of both worlds! To accept a lucrative "buyout" from a major airline while continuing to siphon off a substantial salary from the beat up and bruised membership.....OUTRAGEOUS!
"Consistent with our Constitution and past practice I will serve out the remainder of my term" Defending such an unethical decision in the name of "past practice"? Is this not reminiscent of having International Officers not even being flight attendants but speaking on their behalf?? Is this not eerily reminiscent of former Teamster base representatives speaking on your behalf and not even being flight attendants!
So much for the AFA claim we are a "bottom up" organization. Quite the contrary. AFA leaders on the Local Level (LEC) are required to remain active flight attendants while Queen Pat's decision seems to insolate those at the top levels of AFA from the same requirements! That sounds like a "top down" organization, if ever there was one!! The membership is not fooled by your "past practice" rhetoric!
Let's see....2010. Isn't that the time about 14 different AFA Council's contracts are up? Hmmmm
Pat Friend, your failure to relinquish your AFA International Presidency in the face or your recent resignation at United Airlines, is NOT fair, honorable or even in the best interest of your membership!! With more than one half of your term remaining, an immediate election should be called: it's the right and ethical thing to do!
(Then again, ethical and AFA........quite the oxymoron!)